Finally, there's a bit of good news in the fight against COVID-19.

The FDA issued an "emergency use authorization" for remdesivir, an anti-viral drug that could help coronavirus patients recover faster. The medicine isn't a silver bullet, but it's the first therapy that has shown success in clinical trials.

Yet one self-styled healthcare watchdog seems determined to rain on the parade. The Institute for Clinical and Economic Review, better known as ICER, routinely analyzes the "value" that new drugs provide. The organization suggests that insurers should pay as little as $10, and at most $4,460, per 10-day course of treatment. ICER is in no position to act as an arbiter of drug spending — especially at a time like this. COVID-19 has already claimed over 170,000 American lives and cost our country trillions of dollars. Spurring the creation of vaccines and treatments ought to be our top priority. Jawboning drug companies over the cost of therapies isn't helpful.

Of course, it's imperative that treatments and vaccines are affordable. But ICER's report is little more than a publicity stunt, considering that remdesivir's creator, Gilead Sciences, has already pledged to donate its entire existing supply of the drug. Gilead also entered into agreements with five generic manufacturers, which will expand the supply of the treatment to more than 125 countries around the world.

And Gilead isn't alone — nearly every company working on coronavirus vaccines and treatments has promised these drugs will be widely available, and in many cases, completely free for patients.

ICER states that since the manufacturer is repurposing remdesivir — which was originally a failed Ebola treatment — the company has already recouped the full cost of research and development. As such, it could sell the drug at cost, for only $10 for a ten-day treatment.

This claim, frankly, makes no sense. Remdesivir hasn't generated any real revenue thus far — after all, it failed in Ebola clinical trials.

If ICER's misguided notion — namely, that insurers should only pay drug companies enough to recoup their immediate manufacturing costs — goes mainstream, it would discourage pharmaceutical manufacturers from researching new treatments for COVID-19 and many other diseases.

That calculation doesn't merely neglect the massive upfront costs of drug development. It also ignores the economic benefits that new treatments provide. Our global economy was shuttered for months, and billions of people are waiting for COVID-19 treatments or vaccines. The idea that a medicine that helps reopen the economy and get millions of people back to work is only worth $10 is ludicrous.

ICER has made it abundantly clear that it's willing to put a price on patients' lives. Unfortunately, this price is as always a nonsense creation.

It's revealing that a self-appointed advocate for patients is grandstanding about the price of the only effective coronavirus treatment — a treatment that the manufacturer has already promised to give away for free.

Paul C. Langley, Ph.D. is a professor at the University of Minnesota, director of Maimon Research, and research director of the Institute for Patient Access.

0
0
0
0
0

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.